Tuesday, August 31, 2010

What Do Hannah Montana Sister Play On Tv

the reification of binding precedent

1 .- Introduction.

An unfavorable emotion caused me to gain access to the claims of the Supernumerary Judge Maria Teresa Cabrera Vega and Luis Alberto Quispe Provisional Judge Shock during Judge program on Radio broadcast on "Radio CaƱete on 07/24/2010 .

According to the Press Release N ° 226 - 2010-OPII-CSJL, the judges stated: "The benefits of redemption prison the penalty for work and education, semi-freedom and conditional release are not applicable to those convicted of rape of a minor "and" stressed that the invalidity of the pardon, commutation of sentence and the right of pardon for those convicted of crimes above. "

Obviously the context of discovery of the judges in question, it is noteworthy, for it "objectifies human beings, making them unrecoverable born criminals and society in contravention of the principle and right of judicial functions contained in paragraph 22 Article 139 of the Constitution of Peru more heinous crime has been committed, but just-esteem-known that these individuals comes from a society which we all belong, and indeed more so, I believe, unaware that anywhere in the world to social problems solved by punishment civilian deaths or cancellations human cell, because criminal law is not part of the mental health program policy outlined by the MOH.

is a fallacy to say that for reasons of "national security" those convicted of these heinous crimes must remain on "life without any benefit to prison," not only a fallacy, but I believe a lack elementary complex social, psychological and anthropological the judges mentioned that administer justice in the city of Lima, befitting a "police state regime, for example the Nazi Regime officials who were addicted to the hygiene legislation Racial and justified the deaths of 200,000 human beings with physical handicaps and mental and insane, and criminals, ie for the crime of not being as one.

The expression "life unworthy of being lived" (German for "lebensunwertes Leben", literally "life unworthy of life") was incorporated into Nazi rhetoric to refer to sections of the population which, according to the racial hygiene policies of the Third Reich, were denied the right to life and therefore, ultimately, should be sterilized or killed.

2 .- Development

In the philosophy of science usually distinguishes between the context of discovery and context of justification of scientific theories, the first activity is to discover or articulate a theory that is not susceptible kind of logical analysis, the only thing that fits in the context of discovery is to show how it generates and develops the scientific knowledge that is you can draw distinctions between psychological motives, social context, ideological circumstances, so they moved to a particular judge to issue a certain resolution.

words from the Theory of Legal Argumentation, we can say that applying the context of discovery on press statements supporting the unusual perspective of judges who calls us, is evidence of a social prejudice and discrimination against offenders as the objectified, and are denied their dignity as human beings, as opposed to the values \u200b\u200bderived from the principles of democratic rule of law that, for example, states in the FJ N ° 151 and following of the STC No. 0010-2002 - AI / TC, "In the democratic state of law, prison system is to re-education, rehabilitation and reintegration of the prisoner to society, "which, under our Constitution, Article 139, paragraph 22), is one of the principles of the prison system, which, in turn, is consistent with Article 10.3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which states that "the penitentiary system shall comprise treatment of essential aim of which shall be their reformation and social rehabilitation of prisoners."

That, as outlined in the FJ to No. 15 from No. 1593-2003-PHC/TC STC, the justification for imprisonment is ultimately protection of society against crime. This can only make sense, "if it takes a period of deprivation of freedom to achieve, if possible, that the offender is not only willing to respect the law and provide for their needs but also to be able to do so" .

In short this is not a personal attack, but regular exercise is the right to criticize the opinions of two judges in the exercise of their functions, and they express their mental paradigms, which unfortunately does not coincide with the values \u200b\u200band constitutional definitions of a modern democratic state of law, nor the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court.

3 .- Conclusions

A. - Perhaps most important problem, is to say that regardless of compliance with the formal requirements established by law, the granting of prison benefits is subject to prior judicial assessment that the inmate can be reinstated for having rehabilitated, aimed at verification of compliance with legal requirements, and a business valuation to determine whether the treatment of prisoners has achieved its purpose, so that Article 55 of the Code of Penal Procedure states that the benefit "[...] parole will be granted in cases where the nature of the crime task, the agent's personality and behavior within the facility, to suggest that will not commit new crimes. "

B. - In that sense, what matters is the assessment and legal reasons, not the report of INPE, which is a circumstantial evidence or illustrative data on the process of rehabilitation and resocialization of the sentenced person;

C. - In any event, it set a genuine criminal policy, and consequently raise the scientific and technical level of criminal rehabilitation programs in Peru, recognizing the many nations and cultures within the territory. Jonny

Ricardo Moreno Ccancce
Member of the Advisory Committee on Civil Litigation and Real

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Bushnell Laser Yardage Pro Trophy

CONVICTED OF TC: FEE FOR SOCIAL BENEFITS DOES NOT CONSENT OF DISMISSAL AND IS NOT grounds for inadmissibility

SOCIAL BENEFITS FEE DOES NOT CONSENT OF DISMISSAL AND IS NOT THE UNDER grounds for inadmissibility

The Constitutional Tribunal (TC) issued a landmark decision declaring the petition for relief founded on File No. 03052-2009-PA/TC, setting a binding precedent that payment of compensation for length of service shall not be deemed as consent by the dismissal and the causes of inadmissibility of the process for defense. Has also been established that the payment of social benefits should be made independently and differential the payment of compensation for unfair dismissal or other items that have the same purpose, for this purpose the employer shall make such payments in separate accounts or through certificates of deposit in separate lawsuits.


The effects of these rules apply to the processes of the date of publication of this statement on the website are pending in both the Judiciary and the Constitutional Court and those who get in later. Also, there is this sentence report to the Ministry of Labour and Employment, in order to disseminate the decision and inform workers about the requirements to contest a dismissal harmful fundamental rights.

In accordance with Article VII of the Preliminary Title of the Code of the Constitution, and bearing in mind that different courts have been applying operators the jurisprudence set by the Collegiate previous case regarding the declaration of invalidity of the shelter when the employee was paid his compensation for length of service, this school from the date change of approach, which is compliance - mandatory - in order to generate predictability in legal operators.

Lima, August 23, 2010

OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL IMAGE

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

My Sharp Tv Keeps Turning Itself Off

MINISTRY UNDER THE PUBLIC: FLUGOGRAMAS OF PROCESSES IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE USED CARS

Code of Criminal Procedure


Map Peruvian New Criminal Law (Middle and Trial Stages)
Map Peruvian New Criminal Law (Research Stage School)
Flow Diagram of the Several New Content Criminal Procedure Code Flow Diagram
by Institution of the New Criminal Procedure Code and Criminal Procedure Code

Monday, August 16, 2010

Coach Outlet Mn Albertville Image

: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECLARES VOID EMPOWERS PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES AND START FROM CIVIL AND CRIMINAL JUDGES dealt treacherously

The sentence passed in Exp No. 00001-2010-CC/TC, the Constitutional Court has set a precedent binding, among others, the following rules: a.


Court rulings that have the non-application of Legislative Decree No. 843, or the Supreme Decrees Nos. 045-2000-MTC, 053-2000-MTC, 017-2005-MTC-MTC 042-2006 or Emergency Decrees Nos. 079-2000, 086-2000, 050-2008 and 052-2008, or in violation resolved, away or unobserved rules established as a precedent binding on the STC 05961-2009-PA/TC are null and void for being unconstitutional . B.

Judges who have issued judgments, providing for derogation of Legislative Decree No. 843, or the Supreme Decrees Nos. 045-2000-MTC, 053-2000-MTC-MTC 017-2005 and 042-2006 - MTC or the Emergency Decrees Nos. 079-2000, 086-2000, 050-2008 and 052-2008, or in violation resolved, unobserved away or established rules as binding precedent 05961-2009-PA/TC STC, must be prosecuted and sanctioned by the National Judicial Council and the Office of Judicial Control. C.

Entities of public administration are disabled to comply with any court order issued beginning June 18, 2010 that disapplying Legislative Decree No. 843, or the Supreme Decrees Nos. 045-2000-MTC, 053-2000 -MTC, 017-2005-MTC-MTC 042-2006 or the Emergency Decrees Nos. 079-2000, 086-2000, 050-2008 and 052-2008 or in contravention or failure to observe the rules established as a precedent binding on 05961-2009-PA/TC STC. D.

Judges who have issued judgments that provide for the disapplication of Legislative Decree No. 843, or the Supreme Decrees Nos. 045-2000-MTC, 053-2000-MTC, 017-2005-MTC-MTC 042-2006 or decrees Emergency Nos. 079-2000, 086-2000, 050-2008 and 052-2008, or in violation resolved, departing from established rules or unobserved as binding precedent 05961-2009-PA/TC STC, must be reported criminal by the prosecution for the crime of malfeasance.

Finally, the Constitutional Court has ruled that the precautionary measures to provide for the disapplication of Legislative Decree No. 843, or the Supreme Decrees Nos. 045-2000-MTC, 053-2000-MTC, 017-2005-MTC and 042-2006-MTC or Decrees Emergency Nos. 079-2000, 086-2000, 050-2008 and 052-2008, as well as being null and void for being unconstitutional, the defendant generated promote the declaration of civil liability as judges, lawyers and plaintiffs .

Lima, August 12, 2010

Why Vasodilation In Acidosis

Theory of legal reasoning: Resolving the OCMA-SUSPENDED BY A CRIMINAL JUSTICE AWAY FROM HIS DUTY TO MOTIVATE RESOLUTION JUDICIAL DECISION ISSUED unrelated to the express mandate of the ACT THEORY

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE DUTY OF MOTIVATION JUDGMENTS.
ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE THEORY OF

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Illustrated Guide To Rifle Barrel Fitting

legal reasoning: ABOUT SOME OF atingentes Fallacies in argumentation MORAL-MARTIN D. FARRELL

Polite Birthday Invatation

CONCLUSIONS OF FULL LIMA CIVIL JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2009 NATIONAL JUDICIAL

Projector Bright Enough

FULL CONTEXT OF DISCOVERY

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Itchy Legs After Epilating

FAMILY: POLICIES FOR PROCESSING POWER GROUP IN PERU-Jaris MUJICA

"The context of discovery involve in the study of a phenomenon, which the student chooses specific position in order to give an explanation to a particular theory. And on such a manifestation, it is not required an explanation justifying .. Atienza referred to on this kind of context is found or sustain a legal solution to a given conflict and applies to all disciplines ... "Edwin Figeroa
Gutarra, Legal Supplement Analisi Juridica, Diario El Peruano Lima 13-10 - 2009.

"... Many of these organizations are directly concerned by the political space, the laws and therefore built to influence these mechanisms and public policies ... "
Research article Anthropologist of the Mujica Jaris (Lima 1981)